Law school’s empirical research center receives grant to help update Supreme Court Database

Researchers at the School of Law’s Center for Empirical Research in the Law (CERL) will receive $191,000 to update the Supreme Court Database as part of a $900,000 grant from the National Science Foundation.

The database, originally created by Harold Spaeth, J.D., professor of political science at Michigan State University, contains information about all Supreme Court cases from 1953 to the present.

Over the next four years, the database will be expanded to include cases dating back to the first case heard by the Supreme Court in 1793.

Once complete, it will be the most comprehensive repository of statistical records available, spanning every justice vote and case throughout the court’s history.

“The Supreme Court Database project is important to the academic community and the public,” said Andrew D. Martin, Ph.D., professor of law and professor and chair of the Department of Political Science in Arts & Sciences. “Hundreds of academic studies are based on these data, and having a more comprehensive collection will broaden the scholarly impact.

“The project also provides a Web tool that lawyers, journalists and interested citizens can use to research cases and perform statistical summaries of the Supreme Court,” Martin said. “The project will greatly contribute to our understanding of the court.”

The project is a collaborative effort among scholars at Northwestern University, Michigan State University, the University of Pennsylvania, Princeton University, Stony Brook University and Washington University.

CERL serves as the technological home for the project and is responsible for maintaining and updating the project’s Web-based infrastructure.

Martin, the founding director of CERL, said that, when complete, the database will “open up the doors to all types of questions that we haven’t been able to answer before.”

He said that scientists and legal scholars for the first time will be able to map the nation’s legal development dating back to the Supreme Court’s first decisions.